https://kroonika.delfi.ee/artikkel/66170892/galojan-vs-ilves-londonis-presidenti-suure-saatjaskonnaga-kuulanud-anna-maria-galojani-hoiatati-vahelesegamise-eest This is a Kroonika (Delfi) “Stars” item dated 22 May 2013 (16:15) titled “Galojan vs Ilves: Londonis presidenti suure saatjaskonnaga kuulanud Anna-Maria Galojani hoiatati vahelesegamise eest” (“Galojan vs Ilves: In London, Anna-Maria Galojan—who listened to the president with a large entourage—was warned against interrupting”). It reports that President Toomas Hendrik Ilves was speaking in the UK (at an event hosted by The Henry Jackson Society, per the intro) about cyber security / governance themes, and that Galojan was present in the audience. The key “hook” is that organisers allegedly warned her not to interfere and that only topic-relevant questions would be allowed, implying an attempt to prevent her from challenging Ilves publicly. Why it matters to her story: it documents the “soft containment” pattern outside the courtroom: even when she turns up as a member of the public to hear him speak, the event is framed as needing management around her presence, suggesting reputational sensitivity and a desire to keep uncomfortable lines of questioning away from the president. As a Source Library artefact, it supports your broader theme that the dispute wasn’t only legal—it played out as a long-running struggle over who is allowed to ask what, in which rooms, and under what conditions.