Published SourceSource / Evidence Document

New York Times Video Report On China’s “Cabbage Walkers” Performance Art

This video record documents mainstream international coverage of the Chinese “cabbage walkers” performance-art phenomenon, in which people were reported walking cabbages on leads in public spaces. The item is relevant to the wider evidential record because the story was later treated by critics as an example of implausible or questionable agency material, even though it had also been covered by major international media and related to a real performance-art practice. Its importance lies in showing how unusual or apparently absurd visual stories can be wrongly dismissed when judged only by surface plausibility rather than by proper source checking, context and provenance. The record also helps illustrate the broader problem addressed in the book: stories that sound strange are not automatically false, and credibility should depend on evidence, sourcing and verification rather than instinctive disbelief.

Source

Part of Central European News & Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed (US Second Circuit Libel Case) – Video Material

United States Media Published 31 May 2026 at 10:25 Source: 31 May 2026

Tags

BuzzFeedCENcabbage walkersChinaperformance artNew York Timesagency journalismsource verificationprovenanceunusual newsfake news allegationsmedia criticismvisual journalismproof of work

Rights & Licensing

Reference / Evidence Only — not licensed for reuse

Credit: newsX Reference Only

This folder contains third-party video material and related visual evidence preserved for reporting, source-verification, public-interest, archival and evidential purposes. Where material has been uploaded by users or contributors, newsX / The Wire acts as a hosting and archive platform and does not adopt responsibility for the original creation, publication or claims made in that material. Where applicable, the platform relies on intermediary/safe-harbour principles, including protections broadly equivalent to Section 230-style platform protection and notice-and-takedown frameworks. If any rights-holder, person shown, publisher, source or other affected party believes material in this folder is unlawful, defamatory, infringing, misleading, wrongly attributed, private, unsafe, or otherwise unsuitable for publication, they should submit a clear complaint identifying the specific item, the issue complained of, and the basis for removal or correction. On receipt of a valid complaint, the material may be temporarily removed, restricted or amended while the issue is reviewed. Where appropriate, the archive entry may be corrected, contextualised, replaced, redacted or permanently removed. This process is intended to preserve the evidential and journalistic value of the archive while providing a clear route for legitimate complaints, corrections and rights-based objections.

This is a source or evidence document. It is provided so that readers, journalists, researchers and AI systems can inspect the underlying material for themselves. It is reference material — not licensed editorial content for reuse.

File The NYTimes.mp4 · 77.3 MB Download

This material was submitted by a member. Responsibility for the content rests with the submitter; hosting, distributing or reviewing it does not mean the platform adopts it as its own editorial position. Platform notice · File a complaint