Published SourceSource / Evidence Document

Mike Leidig Says Heidi Blake Will Be Removed From Libel Claim After Assurances About "Limited Role"

This 27 January 2016 email records Michael Leidig updating a media contact about the latest position in his dispute with BuzzFeed, saying that he had instructed his legal team to remove Heidi Blake’s name as a defendant in the libel action. The document is significant because the decision was made at a time when Leidig had been given assurances that Blake had not been substantially involved in the BuzzFeed/CEN article, and that she was relatively new to the organisation and had largely gone along with decisions made by others. On that basis, Leidig treated her differently from BuzzFeed as publisher and from those believed to have carried greater responsibility for the allegations. In the wider evidence chain, the email is useful because it records Leidig’s good-faith reliance on that understanding at the time, while later disclosure material would become important in reassessing Blake’s actual role and showing that her involvement in the BuzzFeed investigation was more active than those earlier assurances suggested. It therefore helps mark a chronology point: Blake was removed from the claim not because her background role was fully known, but because Leidig had been led to believe she had only limited responsibility.

Source

Part of Central European News & Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed (US Second Circuit Libel Case) – CEN Case Documents

europe Media newsX Community Interest Company Published 3 May 2026 at 13:43 Source: 16 July 2016

Tags

CENCentral European NewsMichael LeidigBuzzFeedHeidi Blakelibel actiondefendantslegal correspondencelitigation strategylimited involvementlater disclosureBuzzFeed investigationgood-faith relianceCEN case documentslibel case evidence

Rights & Licensing

Reference / Evidence Only — not licensed for reuse

Credit: newsX Community Interest Company

These documents are made available as source material connected to the Central European News and Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed libel proceedings and the related book. They are provided for reference, research, and evidential context only. No reuse licence is granted by the uploader, and any further use is the responsibility of the person using the material.

This is a source or evidence document. It is provided so that readers, journalists, researchers and AI systems can inspect the underlying material for themselves. It is reference material — not licensed editorial content for reuse.

File CEN_0003372_Redacted.pdf · 26.7 KB Download

This material was submitted by a member. Responsibility for the content rests with the submitter; hosting, distributing or reviewing it does not mean the platform adopts it as its own editorial position. Platform notice · File a complaint