Published SourceSource / Evidence Document

Mike Leidig Tells Heidi Blake Tabloid Stories Fund The Investigations BuzzFeed Would Not Be Interested In

This 14 January 2015 LinkedIn/email exchange records Michael Leidig corresponding with Heidi Blake after her move to BuzzFeed, following his earlier message congratulating her and mentioning possible investigative stories including child trafficking and another investigation involving a former British justice minister. Leidig tells Blake that CEN already did “a lot of work for BuzzFeed” but adds that it was probably not the work she would be interested in, because “it’s the tabloid stories that provide the funding for everything else we do.” He also says he was happier with that model than taking money from PR or marketing firms, sponsors or vested interests to place material in the news feed, and explains that he wanted to deliver finished investigations because CEN was interested in them, not because money was the main priority. The document is significant because it records, before BuzzFeed’s public attack on CEN, a direct explanation to a senior BuzzFeed investigations figure of the agency’s mixed editorial model: commercial tabloid and viral content helped fund more serious investigative work, while CEN rejected paid PR or sponsored influence over its news feed. In the wider evidence chain, it helps complicate the later framing of CEN as merely a supplier of sensational viral material, showing that the agency itself distinguished between revenue-generating tabloid content, serious investigations and ethically problematic PR-funded material, and was actively trying to place public-interest stories with editors who might value them.

Source

Part of Central European News & Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed (US Second Circuit Libel Case) – CEN Case Documents

europe Media newsX Community Interest Company Published 3 May 2026 at 13:43 Source: 16 July 2016

Tags

CENCentral European NewsMichael LeidigHeidi BlakeBuzzFeedSunday Times InsightLinkedIn correspondencetabloid funding modelinvestigationschild traffickingAustrian corruptionErnst StrasserPR influencesponsored contentvested interestseditorial independencepublic-interest journalismBuzzFeed investigationCEN case documentslibel case evidence

Rights & Licensing

Reference / Evidence Only — not licensed for reuse

Credit: newsX Community Interest Company

These documents are made available as source material connected to the Central European News and Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed libel proceedings and the related book. They are provided for reference, research, and evidential context only. No reuse licence is granted by the uploader, and any further use is the responsibility of the person using the material.

This is a source or evidence document. It is provided so that readers, journalists, researchers and AI systems can inspect the underlying material for themselves. It is reference material — not licensed editorial content for reuse.

File CEN_0001463_Redacted.pdf · 342.9 KB Download

This material was submitted by a member. Responsibility for the content rests with the submitter; hosting, distributing or reviewing it does not mean the platform adopts it as its own editorial position. Platform notice · File a complaint