Published SourceSource / Evidence Document

CEN Disabled Access Story Shows Original Human-Interest Reporting Beyond BuzzFeed’s Viral-News Caricature

This CEN case document preserves a 13 October 2014 story filed by Michael Leidig about a British family in Tyrol fighting to keep safe access to their home for their severely disabled son. The article, bylined to Samantha Cox, details Sue Bacher’s long dispute with Austrian bureaucracy, a neighbour’s right-of-way objection, the demolition of a protective roof over an access path, and the family’s attempts to get help from local authorities, Swarovski, the Red Cross and disability advocates. The item is significant because it shows CEN producing detailed, locally sourced human-interest reporting involving disability rights, access, family hardship, local law and bureaucracy, rather than the shallow viral material suggested by BuzzFeed’s later framing. It matters in the wider CEN/BuzzFeed evidence chain because the story demonstrates the type of original reporting work that often sat behind CEN output: finding affected people, recording their account, seeking response from the other side, adding local institutional context and turning a complicated personal dispute into a publishable story for a wider audience.

Source

Part of Central European News & Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed (US Second Circuit Libel Case) – CEN Case Documents

europe Media newsX Community Interest Company Published 3 May 2026 at 13:43 Source: 16 July 2016

Tags

CENCentral European NewsMichael LeidigSamantha CoxTyrolAustriadisabled accessSue BacherSimon Bacherdisability rightslocal bureaucracyhuman-interest journalismoriginal reportingagency journalismSwarovskiRed Crossright of waysource evidenceBuzzFeedlibel case evidence

Rights & Licensing

Reference / Evidence Only — not licensed for reuse

Credit: newsX Community Interest Company

These documents are made available as source material connected to the Central European News and Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed libel proceedings and the related book. They are provided for reference, research, and evidential context only. No reuse licence is granted by the uploader, and any further use is the responsibility of the person using the material.

This is a source or evidence document. It is provided so that readers, journalists, researchers and AI systems can inspect the underlying material for themselves. It is reference material — not licensed editorial content for reuse.

File CEN_0005673_Redacted.pdf · 425.1 KB Download

This material was submitted by a member. Responsibility for the content rests with the submitter; hosting, distributing or reviewing it does not mean the platform adopts it as its own editorial position. Platform notice · File a complaint