Screenshot of a BuzzFeed article titled “This Woman Is Wrongly Being Called A Sexual Predator After Her Private Photos Were Stolen”, used here not simply as a story about online reputational harm, but as an example of Ryan Broderick’s method of accepting one newspaper’s narrative over competing versions without clear original reporting or proof. The significance, as set out in the book, is that Broderick appears to have treated one account as authoritative because someone claimed the woman in the images looked like another person, without providing a name or proper evidence that it was actually her. The record matters because Broderick later became part of the BuzzFeed campaign against CEN’s foreign-news material, demanding explanations and presenting himself as an arbiter of verification, while his own work showed the same weakness: reliance on secondary narratives, thin identification claims and borrowed reporting rather than independently established facts. It is also useful in the wider BuzzFeed/CEN narrative because Broderick was later associated with plagiarism allegations, making this article relevant as an example of the same broader problem: using other people’s material or claims while applying a far harsher standard to others.