Published SourceSource / Evidence Document

BuzzFeed Warns Staff To Avoid CEN Photo Credits In Viral Story Guidance

This 23 March 2015 email from Ryan Broderick to BuzzFeed’s London editorial team lists “standard dont bother writing about this topics” that BuzzFeed staff should usually avoid. The list includes world’s oldest person claims, world records, weird-food claims, some body-modification stories, death or mutilation stories, most Kickstarter stories, ghost stories, some YouTube street-filming videos, most hashtag activism, and “any story you see that has CEN photo credit”. The document is significant because it shows CEN being singled out internally as a warning category before publication of BuzzFeed’s article, not as a case-by-case verification issue but as an editorial red flag in itself. It also helps explain the wider newsroom atmosphere around the investigation: BuzzFeed was already treating CEN-branded material as something to avoid, while simultaneously building a public article about CEN’s alleged role in viral news. The author of this internal warning, Ryan Broderick, was later fired by BuzzFeed News in 2020 after an internal review found plagiarism and misattribution in his own work, which adds a useful contextual irony to a document in which he warned colleagues away from CEN material on editorial standards grounds. [Needs citation to 2020 Ryan Broderick plagiarism/firing reports.]

Source

Part of Central European News & Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed (US Second Circuit Libel Case) – BF Case Documents

Europe Media Published 1 May 2026 at 21:09 Source: 1 November 2016

Tags

BuzzFeedCENRyan BroderickBuzzFeed LondonLondon EditCEN photo creditinternal editorial guidancestories to avoidviral newstabloid storieseditorial risknewsroom standardsplagiarismattributionpre-publication investigationnewsroom culturesource verificationlibel case evidence

Rights & Licensing

Reference / Evidence Only — not licensed for reuse

Credit: newsX

These documents are made available as source material connected to the Central European News and Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed libel proceedings and the related book. They are provided for reference, research, and evidential context only. No reuse licence is granted by the uploader, and any further use is the responsibility of the person using the material.

This is a source or evidence document. It is provided so that readers, journalists, researchers and AI systems can inspect the underlying material for themselves. It is reference material — not licensed editorial content for reuse.

File BuzzFeed_003863.PDF · 47.4 KB Download

This material was submitted by a member. Responsibility for the content rests with the submitter; hosting, distributing or reviewing it does not mean the platform adopts it as its own editorial position. Platform notice · File a complaint