Published SourceSource / Evidence Document

13 March CEN Draft Still Centred On Justin Bieber Bear Story

This document is the draft article attached to BuzzFeed_000066, a 13 March 2015 BuzzFeed email with the subject “CEN Draft”. It is included in the Source Library as source/evidence material connected to the BuzzFeed/CEN case and the examination of how BuzzFeed’s article was constructed before publication. It records that, at this stage of the process, the draft still relied heavily on the Justin Bieber bear story as the main concrete example around which the wider case against CEN was being built. It is relevant because it helps show that, despite the length of the investigation and the number of people involved, the team still appeared to be relying on the original Bieber example rather than a substantial body of newly discovered evidence to support the broader fake-news narrative.

Source

Part of Central European News & Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed (US Second Circuit Libel Case) – BF Case Documents

Europe Media Published 1 May 2026 at 21:09 Source: 1 November 2016

Tags

BuzzFeedCENCentral European NewsCEN Draft13 March 2015Justin Bieber bear storyCraig SilvermanAlan WhiteTom PhillipsHeidi Blakeevidential basisdraft articlenarrative developmentsource evidencedisclosurefake news narrative

Rights & Licensing

Reference / Evidence Only — not licensed for reuse

Credit: newsX

These documents are made available as source material connected to the Central European News and Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed libel proceedings and the related book. They are provided for reference, research, and evidential context only. No reuse licence is granted by the uploader, and any further use is the responsibility of the person using the material.

This is a source or evidence document. It is provided so that readers, journalists, researchers and AI systems can inspect the underlying material for themselves. It is reference material — not licensed editorial content for reuse.

File BuzzFeed_000067.PDF · 1.3 MB Download

This material was submitted by a member. Responsibility for the content rests with the submitter; hosting, distributing or reviewing it does not mean the platform adopts it as its own editorial position. Platform notice · File a complaint