Published SourceSource / Evidence Document

BuzzFeed Traces Chinese Viral Stories While Still Relying On Assumptions About CEN Supply

This 14–15 January 2015 email chain shows Alan White, Tom Phillips and Craig Silverman tracing Chinese viral stories through Weibo, Sina, Xinhua, the Mirror, MailOnline, Metro, the New York Post and other sites as part of the early CEN investigation. The chain is significant because it shows BuzzFeed trying to reconstruct story origins through links, watermarks, pixelation, reverse-search logic and language help, while still making assumptions about what CEN had supplied and how Chinese material had moved through the viral-news system. Phillips notes that they need “someone Chinese” to understand one source trail, while White suggests getting a Mandarin speaker for “a couple days work looking at story spread”. Silverman says one example helps provide evidence on the “content theft side of things” because, according to “the guy in Austria”, CEN would “grab anything from anywhere scrub out watermarks and push it out as their own”. The document is also useful because Silverman says he has found someone claiming that, after following up some CEN stories, sources quoted by CEN said they had never been interviewed, but he is still “working to get some names”. That shows the allegations were being built before named source evidence had been secured. The wider value is that this early investigation was still a process of online reconstruction, suspicion and attempted language verification, not settled proof of what CEN itself had done.

Source

Part of Central European News & Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed (US Second Circuit Libel Case) – BF Case Documents

Europe Media Published 1 May 2026 at 21:09 Source: 1 November 2016

Tags

BuzzFeedCENMike LeidigAlan WhiteTom PhillipsCraig SilvermanRyan BroderickWeiboSinaXinhuaMailOnlineMirrorMetroNew York PostChinese viral storiesMandarin speakerwatermarkspixelationreverse image searchcontent theft allegationquote verificationsource verificationstory spreadpre-publication investigationlibel case evidence

Rights & Licensing

Reference / Evidence Only — not licensed for reuse

Credit: newsX

These documents are made available as source material connected to the Central European News and Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed libel proceedings and the related book. They are provided for reference, research, and evidential context only. No reuse licence is granted by the uploader, and any further use is the responsibility of the person using the material.

This is a source or evidence document. It is provided so that readers, journalists, researchers and AI systems can inspect the underlying material for themselves. It is reference material — not licensed editorial content for reuse.

File BuzzFeed_007363.PDF · 906.3 KB Download

This material was submitted by a member. Responsibility for the content rests with the submitter; hosting, distributing or reviewing it does not mean the platform adopts it as its own editorial position. Platform notice · File a complaint