Published SourceSource / Evidence Document

BuzzFeed Struggles To Identify Its Own Previous CEN Posts Including Bieber Bear Attack Before Publication

This 1 April 2015 email shows Alan White telling Robert Colvile and Tom Phillips that BuzzFeed’s own data team had been “a bit useless” when asked to help find BuzzFeed’s previous CEN posts, meaning the team would have to do it “the old-fashioned way” using Google “supersearch” and hoping they had found them all. White adds that he “had no idea” BuzzFeed had done the Bieber bear attack story, giving a concrete example of BuzzFeed discovering more of its own CEN-linked material while the article was still being edited. The document is significant because it shows BuzzFeed had not fully established the extent of its own previous use of CEN material even as it was preparing to publish a major article attacking CEN and other publishers for using such stories. It is also important because the Bieber bear attack story was the item that helped connect BuzzFeed with Craig Silverman’s work, yet Silverman himself appears to have focused on MailOnline’s use of the story without noticing, or at least without foregrounding, BuzzFeed’s own use of the same material. On that reading, an example used to criticise MailOnline and CEN could just as easily have raised the same question about BuzzFeed. The document therefore sits directly with the client/customer issue: rather than transparently setting out the practical history of BuzzFeed’s CEN use, the team was still trying to reconstruct that history shortly before publication, apparently without confidence that it had found everything.

Source

Part of Central European News & Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed (US Second Circuit Libel Case) – BF Case Documents

Europe Media Published 1 May 2026 at 21:09 Source: 1 November 2016

Tags

BuzzFeedCENMike LeidigAlan WhiteRobert ColvileTom PhillipsCraig SilvermanBuzzFeed data teamCEN postsBuzzFeed CEN useBieber bear storyMailOnlineGoogle searchclient customer issuepre-publication editingsource verificationmedia accuracylibel case evidence

Rights & Licensing

Reference / Evidence Only — not licensed for reuse

Credit: newsX

These documents are made available as source material connected to the Central European News and Mike Leidig v BuzzFeed libel proceedings and the related book. They are provided for reference, research, and evidential context only. No reuse licence is granted by the uploader, and any further use is the responsibility of the person using the material.

This is a source or evidence document. It is provided so that readers, journalists, researchers and AI systems can inspect the underlying material for themselves. It is reference material — not licensed editorial content for reuse.

File BuzzFeed_004398.PDF · 28.1 KB Download

This material was submitted by a member. Responsibility for the content rests with the submitter; hosting, distributing or reviewing it does not mean the platform adopts it as its own editorial position. Platform notice · File a complaint