This 4 May 2015 email shows Tom Phillips receiving a forwarded CEN story from a redacted contact after BuzzFeed’s CEN article had already been published, with the contact reacting angrily that CEN had supplied screenshots from a porn casting video and “actually sent us the porn video”. The document is significant because it shows the same pattern continuing after publication: a publisher-side contact passing CEN material to BuzzFeed and using it to reinforce the view that CEN should be “shut down”, while the underlying editorial practice is more complicated than the contact’s reaction suggests. In agency and picture/video-desk workflows, original source material may be requested or supplied so that publishers can verify, assess, describe, crop, blur, pixelate or otherwise process sensitive material according to their own editorial standards; that does not mean the original unedited material is intended for publication. The forwarded CEN note is also relevant because it says CEN had reviewed its editorial procedures, added checks, and required stories to include contact details, original-language source material, screenshots, original text and verification with emergency services where needed. The document should be read alongside the earlier MailOnline contact documents and BuzzFeed’s post-publication follow-up material, because it shows BuzzFeed continuing to receive and preserve confidential publisher-side CEN material while the public narrative about CEN’s standards and supposed recklessness was still being amplified.